back to the first (or to the last) of the chained sketches about Valcamonica
contents Art links to load the work in the left frame:
link to load the French text in the left frame: (the links above open the sketches in the left frame)
Other expressions of the paradox to assemble/ to separate
- analytic expression from the a6 type: the
shoulders and the thighs of the figures firmly assemble with their trunk, whereas
their hands and their feet are separating, going towards opposite directions
- analytic expression from the a1 type: because
they are very closed, the two "almost stuck" figures assemble (which is
symbolized on the sketch by the red ring added), but a gap remains
separating them
- analytic expression from the a15 type: the figures
assemble in an unbroken line forming a continuous weave, and we can locate each of them separately
- analytic expression from the a4 type: some figures
assemble by a continuous link, whereas other ones are separated by a gap
- synthetic expression from the s13 type: the
figures assembling in a continuous chain (in green on the sketch) isolate the
figures which are not chained (in black on the sketch) the ones from
the others. So, they separate them
- analytic expression from the a13 type: the
figure at the top (red) and the one in the centre (green) are clearly
separated, and they are linked together (assembled) by a continuous line
- synthetic expression from the s11 type: the
repetition of the U-shape visually assembles the whole figures in this same effect
of U, but this effect is precisely an effect of separation, the effect
of separation of the arms and the legs leaving the trunk
Other expressions of the paradox synchronized/ incommensurable
- analytic expression from the a3 type: the
regularity of the overall weave formed by the figures is very surprising, because
they are drawn top-to-tail and they have different scales (big figures
insert among smaller ones, obviously drawn at a smaller scale). In
addition, some are completely isolated
in the centre of a vacuum, floating without any tie to the nearby ones
- analytic expression from the a10 type: the arms
and the legs are both drawn in the same way of a U - and yet, the arms and the feet look different
Other expressions of the paradox continuous/cut
- analytic expression from the a6 type: some figures group together in a continuous chain (in green on the sketch), whereas the others are isolated and cut the ones from the others (in black on the sketch)
- synthetic expression from the s14 type: the drawing of the figures forms a continuous line (left sketch), but this line is cut in successive stages, each of them being one of the different figures (right sketch)
- analytic expression from the a2 type: some paths continuously follow the background of the drawing, thanks to the gaps between the figures. In reverse, due to figures in chain, the path through the background is completely cut in other directions
- synthetic expression from the s1 type: the arms and the legs of the figures form continuous lines sharply cut off at the place of the hands and of the feet
- first synthetic expression from the s11 type (upper sketch): each figure is made with a continuous line cut in successive stages, each of them being a line segment clearly separated
- second synthetic expression from the s11 type (lower sketch): in the lower part of the engraving (to look at this part: ), the figures
are not linked together by a continuous line, but they continuously repeat, side by side, each of them marking a distinct stage in this continuous band cut in stages they are forming together
- synthetic expression from the s8 type: the figures grouping in a continuous chain (in green on the sketch) cut the other figures the ones from the others (in black on the sketch) - remark: in the expression
a2 we were looking at the difference among the figures (some are linked, other are separated), here we consider the action of some figures separating the other
Other expressions of the paradox tied/independent
- synthetic expression from the s11 type: in the lower part of the engraving (to look at this part: ), the figures repeat, clearly isolated, then independent. Doing this, they tie together in the several horizontal or vertical bands they are forming together
- analytic expression from the a7 type: in the upper part of the engraving (first drawing) the figures are almost systematically tied together by continuous lines, whereas in the lower part of the engraving (second drawing, and its beginning at the bottom of the first drawing) the figures are clearly independent, separated the ones from the others