Preserve our Eyes, not our Drops!    Afficher en Français  Display in English

 

 

 

Intro

What's a Preservative

What are the Consequences

Per Preservative

Comparative Studies

Who's at Risk

Are Labs Aware of This

Are Docs Aware of This

What Preservative Which Drop

Are There Alternatives

What Can You Do

Sign our Petition

Testimonials

Reactions From Labs

News

Contact and Links

Logo: Keratos - Revenir au site, Back to site

 

 

The consequences per preservative

Here's the preservative paradox:

III. Specific Consequences of Some Preservatives: Summary Charts

Corrosive! (sign)We did not focus that much on immediate allergy (Type I) since all molecules involved here and even the active substance is likely to cause this type of allergy. However, this consequence is easy to recognise and is usually quickly solved by avoidance of the product. However, let's not forget that removal isn't the solution for the underlying cause for the treatment. If the étiology of the allergy is the preservative then the solution is a preservative-free version of the product... if it exists.

Consequences are clearly dose-dependent. However, another important variable is the individual's eye health and notably some aggravating factors like lachrymal dysfunctions and ocular surface disease (see the Who's [particularly] at risk? section).

 

Category /Preservative

Consequence

Source (see bellow)

All Quaternary ammoniums (including BAK) Contact Allergy/Eczema (Type IV delayed hypersensivitivy) in 4 to 11% of patch tests for BAK  1 ; 2 ; 5 ; 6 ; 9 ; 10
Benzalkonium Chloride (BAK or BAC) Disruption of the tear film ; soap effect in contact with the lipid layer of the tear film  1 ; 2 ; 6 ; 13 ; 26
Dissecating effect; Dryness, Reduced tear secretion  1 ; 2; 8 ; 19
Cytotoxic (in general)  1 ; 16 ; 17
Pseudo-pemphigoïd (rare) ; Sub-epithelial fibrosis  8 ;
Delayed Healing  14 ;
Epithelial denegeneration; Cessation of normal cell mitotic activity ; reduced cytokinesis  17 ; 2
Cell exfoliation, abrasion, cell lysis; desquamation  11 ; 18
All cells died in 24 hours at 0.1% concentration but reported cell death in concentration as low as 0.0001 %  21 ;
corneal and conjunctival damage, epithelial alterations, various degrees of keratinization, limbal inflammatory infiltrates and within the conjunctival stroma and epithelium  22
short-term exposure can alter the precorneal mucin  27
Cetremide or Cetrimonium Chloride corneal and conjunctival damage, epithelial alterations, various degrees of keratinization, limbal inflammatory infiltrates and within the conjunctival stroma and epithelium  22
Benzododecinium Bromide corneal and conjunctival damage, epithelial alterations, various degrees of keratinization, limbal inflammatory infiltrates and within the conjunctival stroma and epithelium  22
Polexitonium (polyquarternium- 42) "very low toxicity"   28*
Mercurial Derivatives (particularly Thiomersal or Thimerosal) Delayed Allergy (Type IV) in 13 to 37% of patch tests.  9
Thiomersal or Thimerosal Severe allergic reaction; irritation  1 ; 2
Penetration of the tissue: Greyish Coloration of the Lens (Iatrogenic Catact/mercurial impregnation)/ detectable  in several eye tissues  1 ; 23
Band Keratitis, superficial keratitis  1 ;
Cytotoxic (including enlarged inter-cells space ; reduction of natural surface microvillosities)  1 ; 9 ; 11
Increased Permeability in Dry Eye Patients  12
Modification of corneal endothelial cells  15
Cell lysis; Desquamation  9
Corneal and conjunctival damage, epithelial alterations, various degrees of keratinization, limbal inflammatory infiltrates and within the conjunctival stroma and epithelium  22
Amidines (including Chlorhexidine)    
Chlorhexidine Hypersensitivity (allergy) in contact lens wearers  1 ; 7
Cell lysis; Desquamation   9
Accumulation in corneal and conjonctival epithelial cells  2
Alcohols    
Chlorobutanol Cytotoxicity: including Epithelial denegeneration; Cessation of normal cell mitotic activity ; reduced cytokinesis  17 ;
Cell exfoliation ; abrasion  18 ;
Irritation in over 50% of patients  20 ;
Increased Permeability in Dry Eye Patients  12
Increased evaporation  2
Parabens    
Methylparahydroxybenzoate Corneal and conjunctival damage, epithelial alterations, various degrees of keratinization, limbal inflammatory infiltrates and within the conjunctival stroma and epithelium 22 ;
Other Preservatives    
EDTA (or Na2EDTA, ededate disodium) Modification of corneal endothelial cells  15 ;
PBS corneal and conjunctival damage, epithelial alterations, various degrees of keratinization, limbal inflammatory infiltrates and within the conjunctival stroma and epithelium  22 ;

 

Read the Compative Studies

Studies (some studies' abstracts may be available at Pubmed)

1: Les Conservateurs en Ophtalmologie, Docteur Patrice Vo Tan, Docteur Yves Lachkar, Librairie Médicale Théa, 64 pages.

2: American Optometric Association. Care of the patient with ocular surface disorders. St. Louis (MO): American Optometric Association.

3: Comparative study of topical anti-allergic eye drops on human conjunctiva-derived cells: responses to histamine and IFN gamma and toxicological profiles Pauly A, Brignole-Baudouin F, Guenoun JM, Riancho L, Rat P, Warnet JM, Baudouin C. U598, INSERM, Cordeliers Biomedical Institute, 15 rue de l'ecole de medecine, 75006, Paris, France.  CONCLUSIONS: The ability of topical ocular anti-H(1) drugs to significantly reduce the production of IL-6 and IL-8 argues that they may help treat the inflammatory processes occurring in allergic ocular surface disorders. Nevertheless, preserved ophthalmic formulations may enhance epithelial conjunctival expression of ICAM-1 in the presence of a low inflammatory stimulus, such as IFNgamma, and displayed toxic as well as pro-oxidative effects on these cells. Therefore, BAC used as preservative might in part interfere with the potential anti-inflammatory properties of the active compound by modulating the immuno-inflammatory response of epithelial conjunctival cells. To display study click here

4: A comparative study of the ocular tolerance after administration of anti-allergic eye drops with or without a preservative. [Article in French] ,
Beden C, Helleboid L, Marmouz F, Liard F. Societe Naxis, Lyon, France. CONCLUSION: The prescription of eye drops with no preservative allows a significant decrease in ocular adverse drug reactions and a greater acceptance by the patient regarding his/her anti-allergic treatment.

5: Ophtalmologie et allergie cutanée, OPA Pratique, Castelain M & PY, 1991, 50, 1-4.

6: Que faire des malades allergiques au benzalkonium? Verin, Casamayor, Coulon, Williamson, Mortemousque, Ndiyae Pa, Bull. Soc. Ophtalmol. Fr., 1992, 33, 7, 2233-2241.

7:  Ocular inflammation in patients using soft contact lens solution,  Rietschel, Wilson, Arch. Dermatol., 1982, 118, 3, 147-149.

8: ß-Bloquants et conservateurs, Pr. Christophe Baudouin, Centre Hospitalier d'Ophtalomologie des Quinze-Vingts et INSERM U-598, Paris, Visions partagées - April 2004.

9: Allergie, Collyres et conservateurs: rappels, B. mortemousque et Ph. Vérin, CHU Hôpitaux de Bordeaux, Librairie Médicale Théa, n°2.

10: Patch testing in ocular drug allergies, Marsh, Towns, Evans, Trans. Ophthalmol. Soc UK, 1978, 98, 2 278-280.

11: Quantitative cytotoxicity of preservatives evaluated in cell culture with Chang's human conjunctival cells--effect of temperature on cytotoxicity. n. Takahashi, Jpn. Journal of Ophthalmol. 1982;26(2):234-8

12: Corneal epithelial permeability of dry eyes before and after treatment with artificial tears, Göbbels, Spitznas, University Eye Hospital, Bonn, Germany, Ophthalmology, 1992 June; 99(6):873-8.

13: Effect of benzalkonium chloride on the stability of the precorneal tear film in rabbit and man. WS Wilson, AJ Duncan and JL Jay. 1975 by the British Journal of Ophthalmology.

14: The effect of ophthalmic preservatives on the healing rate of the rabbit corneal epithelium after keratectomy, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Collin, Grabsch, 1982 Mar;59(3):215-22.

15: The effect of ophthalmic preservatives on the shape of corneal endothelial cells. Collin, Grabsch, Acta Ophthalmol. Copenhague, 1982 Feb;60(1):93-105.PMID: 6182733 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

16: A new method evaluating quantitative time-dependent cytotoxicity of ophthalmic solutions in cell culture. Beta-adrenergic blocking agents, Nobuo Takahashi, Department of Ophthalmology, Kanazawa Medical University, Uchinadamachi 1-1, Kahoku gun, 920-02 Ishikawa, Japan, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

17: Cytotoxic effects of benzalkonium chloride and chlorobutanol on human corneal epithelial cells in vitro., Tripathi BJ & RC, Eye Research Laboratories, University of Chicago, IL 60637, Lens Eye Toxic Research, 1989;6(3):395-403. PMID: 2486935 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

18: Acute effects of chlorobutanol- or benzalkonium chloride-containing artificial tears on the surface features of rabbit corneal epithelial cells, Doughty MJ, School of Optometry, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, Optometric Vision Sc.  1994 Sep;71(9):562-72. [PMID: 7816427 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

19: Adverse effects of topical antiglaucomatous medications on the conjunctiva and the lachrymal  response, R. Nuzzi1, C. Finazzo1 and A. Cerruti1, Institute of Ophthalmology, University of Turin, Italy, International Ophthalmology.

20: Irritation associated with tear-replacement ophthalmic drops. A pharmaceutical and subjective investigation. Fassihi AR, Naidoo NT. S Afr Med J 1989;75:233-235. PMID: 2648609 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

21: Effects of benzalkonium chloride on growth and survival of Chang conjunctival cells. De Saint Jean M, Brignole F, Bringuier AF, Bauchet A, Feldman G, Baudouin C. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:3:619-30.

22: Histopathological effects of topical ophthalmic preservatives on the rat corneoconjunctival surface. Becquet F, Goldschild M, Moldovan MS, Ettaiche M, Gastaud P, Baudouin C. Current Eye Research 1998;17:4:419-25. PMID: 9561834 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

23. Conservateurs et Surface Oculaire, Quelques bonnes raisons pour abandonner l'utilisation des collyres conservés. Dr. Magda de Saint-Jean,  Pr. Christophe Baudouin, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Librairie Médical Théa.

24. Comparison of toxicological profiles of benzalkonium chloride and polyquaternium-1: an experimental study. Labbe A, Pauly A, Liang H, Brignole-Baudouin F, Martin C, Warnet JM, Baudouin C. Department of Ophthalmology III, Quinze-Vingts National Ophthalmology Hospital, and INSERM U598, Cordeliers Biomedical Institute, University of Paris 5, Paris, France. PMID: 16910868, J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Aug;22(4):267-78 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

25. Quantitative evaluation of the corneal epithelial barrier: effect of artificial tears and preservatives, Lopez Bernal D, Ubels JL. Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226, Curr Eye Res. 1991 Jul;10(7):645-56. PMID: 1914501 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

26. How the most common preservative affects the Meibomian lipid layer, Kaercher T.; Hönig D.; Barth W., Orbit, Volume 18, Number 2, June 1999, pp. 89-97(9), Taylor & Francis Ltd.

27. Impact of short-term exposure of commercial eyedrops preserved with benzalkonium chloride on precorneal mucin, Chung SH, Lee SK, Cristol SM, Lee ES, Lee DW, SEO KY, Kim EK, Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Mol Vis. 2006 Apr 26;12:415-21 PMID: 16688112 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

28. *No published studies to date address the toxicity and surface consequences of polexitonium, to our current knowledge only the Draize test was carried out, which does not warrant total safety of this new preservative. Further independent testing is nedeed in our opinion for use in therapeutic eye drops. However, there are Reference on polexitonium, including " Contact Lenses Solutions...making sense of the multitude, Fiona Flynn-Smith". Remember that safety criteria for contact lens use, which are made for healthy eyes is different from safety for unhealthy corneas (contact lens may require sterile saline cleansing of the lenses before wear and therefore the toxicity of the preservative can be avoided). One manufacturer/ reseller mentions clinical studies at http://www.dryeyezone.com/encyclopedia/busan1507.html but does not provide further indications on safety data. Another manufacturer claims that "FreshKote® has a unique preservative that is not only harmless to the eye but also makes the ocular surface more wettable, just the opposite of what some other preservatives do" in the following webpage http://www.freshkote.com/FAQ.asp.

 

Display a list of additional studies

 

This is what we call the 'Preservative Paradox!

Preserve our Eyes, not our Drops!

Go to International Home - Afficher accueil international

  copyright © Keratos 2007